Why did Germany lose WW2?

One of the great unanswered questions of World War II is Soviet code breaking operations. Without a doubt the Soviets must have worked on German and Japanese codes as well as Allied codes. As far as I know, the Soviets and now the Russians have never released information on their code breaking operations. Nor do I know of a historian that has gained any significan insights into their operations.
 
One of the great unanswered questions of World War II is Soviet code breaking operations. Without a doubt the Soviets must have worked on German and Japanese codes as well as Allied codes. As far as I know, the Soviets and now the Russians have never released information on their code breaking operations. Nor do I know of a historian that has gained any significan insights into their operations.

Also it has to be remembered how many "sympathetic" individuals, known and unknown, in the west were passing information to the Russians.

The thing is, there will never be a clear, concise answer to this because so much is still kept secret as lessons learnt in WWII are still in use today.
The technology has taking a quantum leap forward, but the basics are still the same.
It is an interesting debate, and I have learnt alot, some of which I do not totally agree with, but thats life.
 
One of the great unanswered questions of World War II is Soviet code breaking operations. Without a doubt the Soviets must have worked on German and Japanese codes as well as Allied codes. As far as I know, the Soviets and now the Russians have never released information on their code breaking operations. Nor do I know of a historian that has gained any significan insights into their operations.

I get the impression the Russians relied more on their rather extensive spy rings than code breaking.

However it is an interesting topic and could be well worth looking into.
 
Last edited:
I have heard of him as I have about 6 of his books, I did not know he had produced 400 of them though.

I think we are arguing at cross purposes here, I don't think anyone is saying intelligence isn't important or that it didn't produce benefits for the Allies where the argument stalls is that I am saying it was not decisive in that it never affected the outcome of the war just its timeline.

I don't think we are arguing at cross purposes.

Without ULTRA the Allies as I said, could have lost Suez, the middle east oil fields, a lot more shipping could have been lost instead of routing them around U Boat wolf packs. If Germany had got to Suez, then onto Palestine where the British Army was undermanned (if I remember correctly) the whole war could have taken a different turn.

So many battles in Italy and after D Day in Europe were hard fought, imagine how hard it would have been without ULTRA. And yes, the Soviets were given information from Bletchley Park.
 
I don't think we are arguing at cross purposes.

Without ULTRA the Allies as I said, could have lost Suez, the middle east oil fields, a lot more shipping could have been lost instead of routing them around U Boat wolf packs. If Germany had got to Suez, then onto Palestine where the British Army was undermanned (if I remember correctly) the whole war could have taken a different turn.

So many battles in Italy and after D Day in Europe were hard fought, imagine how hard it would have been without ULTRA. And yes, the Soviets were given information from Bletchley Park.

Yes but to be blunt, IF I was Catholic I COULD be the Pope.

To argue that ULTRA was decisive in the Atlantic campaign you would first have to accept that there was a chance that the Uboats were going to be successful in starving Britain out of the war, now while I have no doubt there were dark moments in the Atlantic war that scenario was never going to happen.

Therefore ULTRA only affected the timeline of the campaign not it's outcome hence it was not decisive.

As lljadw has pointed out even during the early days when Uboats were sinking ships faster than Britain was building them Allied tonnage never decreased due to the influx of captured/impounded ships and the acquisition of ships from conquered countries such as Norway, Poland and Holland.

There were simply not enough Uboats at the beginning to win the campaign and by 1943-1944 when there were enough Uboats it was too late to change the outcome due to Allied technical advances.
 
To give some exemples of the U Boat numbers (source is :U Boat Archive P 59)
on 11/02/42
operational U Boats :1O6 ;big number ? Yes,BUT...
1) 32 in harbours
2) 21 in the Mediterranean ,of which 5 (=five) only in operation,the others being in Italian harbours or returning from patrol
3) 18 in Norway/Northsea,of which 13 operational
4)American coast :35,of which 9 in operation,the others were outward or returning
Total UBoats that were in operation :27
on 12 june 1942:
number of UBoats :186,of which 64 on patrol
on 24 december 1942:
operational :210;on patrol :63
Already before the intervention of Enigma/Ultra,the number of sunk GRT was wildly varying :
june 1940:with 28 operational Uboats :470000 GRT
february 1941:with 21 operational U Boats:225000 GRT
april 1942:with 79 UBoats :465000 GRT
 
I get the impression the Russians relied more on their rather extensive spy rings than code breaking.

However it is an interesting topic and could be well worth looking into.
A good source are the posts of "Paspartoo" on the "German reaction to Ultra/Enigma revelation" thread in the Intelligence operations and Espionage Section of the Axis History Forum .
Warning :these posts will shatter a lot of myths
 
To argue that ULTRA was decisive in the Atlantic campaign you would first have to accept that there was a chance that the Uboats were going to be successful in starving Britain out of the war, now while I have no doubt there were dark moments in the Atlantic war that scenario was never going to happen.

I never suggested that Britain would be starved out, as far as I am aware no one did. Yes there were quite a few dark moments during the U Boat campaign, which I assume worried Churchill.

Therefore ULTRA only affected the timeline of the campaign not it's outcome hence it was not decisive..

I assume you are still talking about the U Boat campaign and not the other campaigns that were won like North Africa and Italy thanks to ULTRA.

To quote Prof. Dr. Jürgen Rohwer as posted by Der Alte

I am sure that without the work of many unknown experts at Bletchley Park…the turning point of the Battle of the Atlantic could not have come as it did in May 1943, but months, perhaps many months, later. In that case the Allied invasion of Normandy could not have been possible in June 1944, and there would have ensued a chain of developments very different from the ones which we have experienced. Now I wonder what those developments could have been and how strange most historians don't agree with you and your mate?

From http://www.militaryhistoryonline.com/wwii/atlantic/enigma.aspx
The introduction by Donitz, from late 1940 onwards, of "wolf-pack" tactics, gave the Enigma codes still greater importance. In order to rendezvous U-boats had to signal their positions to Donitz's operations room. If these messages could be deciphered, it would be possible to divert convoys away from known ambushes. But it was becoming clear that little progress could be made without further captures of enemy material, itself a hazardous procedure, for if the Germans became aware that Enigma material had fallen into enemy hands, their whole cypher system might be changed.

On March 4th 1941, during a Commando raid on the Lofoten Islands off Norway, the Royal Navy captured the German trawler Krebs, along with two Enigma machines and the current settings for use in home waters. This allowed another partial breakthrough, allowing some messages to be read. Donitz, whilst concerned by increased British naval successes, was assured by his cypher experts that Enigma was unbreakable, and tended to suspect that the problem was due to increasingly effective tracking by means of HF/DF signals.

It was in the spring of 1941 that Britain made an important breakthrough in the battle for Enigma. Harry Hinsley, one of the Bletchley codebreakers, realised that the network of German weather and supply ships currently operating in the Atlantic, would carry code information.

The problem lay in capturing some of these without betraying to the enemy exactly what was going on.On May 7th, in a highly secret operation, Royal Navy ships intercepted and captured the weather ship Munchen, seizing the code books to be used in June. Two days later, in one of the most dramatic episodes of the war at sea, depth charges fired by British destroyers forced to the surface U-110, whose commander, Lemp, had sunk the liner Athenia on the opening day of the war. Believing his vessel to be sinking, Lemp failed to destroy either his Enigma machine or its codes. Whilst sailors opened up on the U-boat crew with rifles and machine guns to panic them, and prevent any returning below deck, HMS Bulldog closed in and boarded U-110. Both machine and codes were seized. Lemp was not among the survivors of the U-boat crew, and once again the extent of their success remained a carefully guarded British secret.

The introduction by Donitz, from late 1940 onwards, of "wolf-pack" tactics, gave the Enigma codes still greater importance. In order to rendezvous U-boats had to signal their positions to Donitz's operations room. If these messages could be deciphered, it would be possible to divert convoys away from known ambushes. But it was becoming clear that little progress could be made without further captures of enemy material, itself a hazardous procedure, for if the Germans became aware that Enigma material had fallen into enemy hands, their whole cypher system might be changed.

On March 4th 1941, during a Commando raid on the Lofoten Islands off Norway, the Royal Navy captured the German trawler Krebs, along with two Enigma machines and the current settings for use in home waters. This allowed another partial breakthrough, allowing some messages to be read. Donitz, whilst concerned by increased British naval successes, was assured by his cypher experts that Enigma was unbreakable, and tended to suspect that the problem was due to increasingly effective tracking by means of HF/DF signals.

It was in the spring of 1941 that Britain made an important breakthrough in the battle for Enigma. Harry Hinsley, one of the Bletchley codebreakers, realised that the network of German weather and supply ships currently operating in the Atlantic, would carry code information. The problem lay in capturing some of these without betraying to the enemy exactly what was going on.

On May 7th, in a highly secret operation, Royal Navy ships intercepted and captured the weather ship Munchen, seizing the code books to be used in June. Two days later, in one of the most dramatic episodes of the war at sea, depth charges fired by British destroyers forced to the surface U-110, whose commander, Lemp, had sunk the liner Athenia on the opening day of the war. Believing his vessel to be sinking, Lemp failed to destroy either his Enigma machine or its codes. Whilst sailors opened up on the U-boat crew with rifles and machine guns to panic them, and prevent any returning below deck, HMS Bulldog closed in and boarded U-110. Both machine and codes were seized. Lemp was not among the survivors of the U-boat crew, and once again the extent of their success remained a carefully guarded British secret.

The effect of the improved flow of intelligence information was apparent during the second half of 1941. Increasing numbers of convoys were being diverted away from waiting U-boats. In July, for example, not a single convoy was sighted by the Germans over a period of three weeks, and during July and August monthly sinkings went below 100,000 tons, the lowest for over a year.


As lljadw has pointed out even during the early days when Uboats were sinking ships faster than Britain was building them Allied tonnage never decreased due to the influx of captured/impounded ships and the acquisition of ships from conquered countries such as Norway, Poland and Holland.

I pointed out that little gem that Britain was losing ships faster then they could be built which your mate refuted until I posted proof.

There were simply not enough Uboats at the beginning to win the campaign and by 1943-1944 when there were enough Uboats it was too late to change the outcome due to Allied technical advances.

I agree advances such as ship borne radar also became vital in the Battle of the Atlantic, many U Boats were sunk because of it.
 
A good source are the posts of "Paspartoo" on the "German reaction to Ultra/Enigma revelation" thread in the Intelligence operations and Espionage Section of the Axis History Forum .
Warning :these posts will shatter a lot of myths

Who says that is a good source? You? That's no recommendation sunbeam. A better source would be Alice in Wonderland.

The only myth that has been shattered is your myth "ULTRA made no difference to WW2"

I find it very strange that you refuse accept how vital reliable intelligence is such as ULTRA.

As Trooper mentioned, along the lines of "anyone who refutes or puts down the work done by station X has no real grasp of events in WW2."

Apologies to Trooper if I misquoted you.
 
Last edited:
How can anyone argue that intelligence played no significant part in any conflict?
Might as well do away with Reconnaissance Platoons, Aerial reconnaissance units, military intelligence units etc, and plough the money and resources into combat units that can blunder about the battlefield hoping to bump into each other!

Ultra saved millions of lives, directly by knowing where the enemy were and allowing the correct force of arms to be applied, and indirectly by allowing convoys to go around U-Boats to get their vital cargoes to where they are needed, just for example.

If you want to believe intelligence is over rated, fine, believe it but I really hope you are not involved in military planning in any way, shape or form!
 
saying :Ultra saved millions (sic) of lives,without giving any proof,is only repeating the boastings of BP.
I defy any one to give PROOFS that Ultra was saving millions of lives (one million,or 100000 would be enough).
Did Ultra save millions of lives in the Battle of the Atlantic ? In the war in NA ? during Overlord ?
How many merchant ships were saved by Ultra in the Battle of the Atlantic ? 10? 100 ? 1000? How many lives ?
 
saying :Ultra saved millions (sic) of lives,without giving any proof,is only repeating the boastings of BP.
I defy any one to give PROOFS that Ultra was saving millions of lives (one million,or 100000 would be enough).
Did Ultra save millions of lives in the Battle of the Atlantic ? In the war in NA ? during Overlord ?
How many merchant ships were saved by Ultra in the Battle of the Atlantic ? 10? 100 ? 1000? How many lives ?

I do not need to provide proof.
It is out there for you to read for yourself.
I also suggest you pay Bletchley Park a visit, you'll learn a lot more from visiting historical sights and seeing history.
You are too selective in your "Studies". You only read what you know will back you "theories".
You refuse to accept anything that may disprove what you want to believe.
In the thirty years that I have studied history I have had a number of my ideas overturned by broadening my studies and reading new research, and carrying out my own research, and yes, I AM NOW BOASTING!
You are, a poor historian
Less trolling, more study! More history!
 
Last edited:
I do not need to provide proof.
It is out there for you to read for yourself.
I also suggest you pay Bletchley Park a visit, you'll learn a lot more from visiting historical sights and seeing history.
You are too selective in your "Studies". You only read what you know will back your "theories".
You refuse to accept anything that may disprove what you want to believe.
In the thirty years that I have studied history I have had a number of my ideas overturned by broadening my studies and reading new research, and carrying out my own research, and yes, I AM NOW BOASTING!
You are, a poor historian
Less trolling, more study! More history!

Trooper you'll get more sense out of a brick wall. He's not an historian he's an armchair general who's never worn combat boots or a uniform, unless it was the girl guides. Only a total and utter prat would deny that ULTRA and other intelligence saved lives.

I vaguely remember crossing swords with this idiot some time ago, he was the same then.
 
Last edited:
Trooper you'll get more sense out of a brick wall. He's not an historian he's an armchair general who's never worn combat boots or a uniform, unless it was the girl guides. Only a total and utter prat would deny that ULTRA and other intelligence saved lives.

I vaguely remember crossing swords with this idiot some time ago, he was the same then.

I'm afraid you are very right there Brit.
I've decided not to respond to anymore of his posts as he will not listen to anyone else's point of view, so I'll save my breath to cool my porridge:D
 
I'm afraid you are very right there Brit.
I've decided not to respond to anymore of his posts as he will not listen to anyone else's point of view, so I'll save my breath to cool my porridge:D

No offense but he can say exactly the same thing about you two, can you point to a ship, soldier, tank or aircraft that was definately saved or sunk by ULTRA?

The answer is that you can't because the value of ULTRA was indeterminant, ULTRA gave the Allies an insight into what the Germans were doing but a soldier, tank, plane or ship still had to successfully destroy the opposition and as we have seen with operation Luttich ULTRA's information was incredibly effective however we have also seen with Operation Mercury that knowing the oppositions plans was not enough to guarantee success.

Now this doesn't mean that ULTRA wasn't useful or that it didn't save lives and we all know that it sped up the war but it wasn't decisive in winning the war.
 
saying :Ultra saved millions (sic) of lives,without giving any proof,is only repeating the boastings of BP.
I defy any one to give PROOFS that Ultra was saving millions of lives (one million,or 100000 would be enough).
Did Ultra save millions of lives in the Battle of the Atlantic ? In the war in NA ? during Overlord ?
How many merchant ships were saved by Ultra in the Battle of the Atlantic ? 10? 100 ? 1000? How many lives ?

Not always hard facts but lots of circumstantial evidence. Ultra did save lives, and many.
 
The U Boat losses happened mainly by chance :
in 1943,there were an average some 130 U Boats daily operational (=patrolling,outbound and leaving),they sunk daily some 1.5 ship,that means that it would take 100 days before all of them had ONE succes.
Why ? Because the atlantic is very big,most U Boats never saw a convoy,most convoys al were not attacked,even if they were spotted:if a U Boat spotted a convoy,he had to ask the aid of other U Boats,and,if these were to far away,or the convoy was to fast,the convoy passed without problems .The period when the U Boats were most efficient,was september 1939/may 1940:they had more chances to spot a merchant ship in the "small " Northsea.When the battle was moving to the Atlantic,the chances of the U Boats were decreasing .
It is the same situation for the allies :the chances for the ASW ships/aircraft to detect and destroy a U Boat patrolling in the Atlantic were very small .They had more chances
a)when the U Boats were attacking a convoy
b) when the U Boats were leaving /outbound =in the gulf of Biscay.
From 1 to 15 july 1943,20 U Boats were lost in the gulf of Biscay;a total of 120 U Boats were leaving/returning via the gulf of Biscay in july 1943.
The losses in the first half of july were 33%:20 on 60,a % never obtained in the Atlantic,and,these losses were not caused by Ultra,but by better ASW.
About the claim that without Ultra,Overlord would be delayed by 2 years,and that this would result in millions of casualties
1)one has first to prove that the allied victory in the Battle of the Atlantic in may 1943was caused by Ultra
2) than,one has to prove that no victory in may 1943 would result in no Overlord in june 1944
3) one also has to prove that no victory in may 1943 would exclude a victory in the following months
4)one has also to prove that no Overlord in june 1944 would result in prolonging the war till 1946 .And why would this happen ? There was Bagration and the collaps of the eastern front ,and,why would the Soviets not be in Berlin,without Overlord ?
I hope on a civilised reply,but,I have no illusions .
 
Not always hard facts but lots of circumstantial evidence. Ultra did save lives, and many.
I never said that Ultra did not save lives(whe can discus about the meaning of "many"),but, I do object to the claim by Hinsley,that without Ultra,the war would last 2 years more,with millions of casualties .
May I also add that even without Ultra and Overlord and without a big Soviet victory,the war would end in september 1945,with the A Bom on Germany ,thus,there never would be a Overlord in june 1946:the Soviets wpuld already be in Berlin,or Berlin would be nuked .
 
Here is an interesting thought, ULTRA was not released to the world until sometime around 1974 yet the history of the Second World War has not had to be rewritten simply because Ultra was unveiled, but it has been rethought.
 
Back
Top