Ollie Garchy said:
Greetings,
(1) What are you talking about? The Muslim world has no countermeasures at all. They are just as open to massive retaliation. In fact, they do not even have a proper military. Think of the Iraq wars. The US troops, and a European coalition is just as potent, kicked them in the butt like they were just a bunch of kids. How do you think an EMP can change MILITARY REALITIES? I would speculate that Germany alone could thwart any Islamic invasion...for the same reasons that the Bundeswehr was considered able to blunt a major Soviet drive in the 1980s. And, the Soviets probably would have used an EMP burst at a certain point. This is old stuff. Why would EMP suddenly work for the Islamic world. If EMP is such a great idea, why did the Soviets fail to attack? Why?
The question asked if Europe had all these countermeasures you said; "yes sir". Thats complete BS that you made up.
As far as the Iraq wars. The Iraqi troops were not motivated, this was no Jihad, they were not inavding, the were static in place, they only outnumbered us two to one. Lastly, they were no sabotures sabotaging civilian structures, and or troop supply transport here in the West, if there was the wars would have been totaly different as we know it, just this one factor alone would have made this war totaly different.
As far as the Soviets, go maybe they were smart enough to avoid world war. Because if they used EMP, we would too and collapse their infrastucture which at that time was similar to ours. The fact they didn't attack doesn't matter, who knows what their real reason are. What matrters EMP is in place. Please read the danger of what top officials say it can do. Shall I quote them again. The danger is here, thats what counts.
Beside this whole invasion isn't all about EMP, even without EMP an organized Islamic Empire still has a chance at inading Europe. EMP is just one of many potent resources they can call to on.
(2) EMP countermeasures are military. Yes they are. That is why the Islamic world would have to manufacture a lot of body bags for their soon-to-be-very-dead martyrs.
Yes but it will halt the civilian sector long enough for them to bring their numerical superiority to bear. Along with their in-country jihadist.
(3) The desire for power impacts immigrants. That is, they conform and accept dominant cultural values in order to make a living. Otherwise, they remain poor and powerless. Or are you afraid of unemployed or lower working class immigrants? I am more afraid of the police.
Haha. The poblem with Europe ia they aren't waiting for these immigrant to assimilate. They are helping and catering to them as is. So why should they conform. They have more power staying in their on enclaves and building mini-societies of a country-within-a-country.
Even so to any devout Muslim making a living will not superceed his religion. He will work and still keep his religion. Which Europe is catering too btw. You have no undestanding of how human beliefs plays apart in peoples lives.
I already showed you through your own quote, in a previous post, how flawed you line of thinking regarding this is.
(4) The Muslims are using what they have...yup...nothing plus nothing is still nothing. These countries have the geopolitical power of goat-herders. If the US wants oil, it invades and takes physical control. That sums up Muslim power for me. Oh yes, and then the Muslims throw themselves at the Americans in acts of pure desperation. That is not war. That is just the defininition of futility...or stupidity. That depends on your perspective.
When they start their invasion in some 15 to 20 years you tell they have nothing, and maybe they will believe you and go back.
Right now they have nothing, in 15 years thing can change. Why do you think Iran is trying to develop weapons of all kinds. Is it maybe becuase their president himself believes in this prophecy
The whole issue is made impossible by European & American retaliation. Both are allies in NATO. This will not change or is there a Mahdi prophecy covering this "slight" problem? The issue of retaliation means that any offensive (and it is impossible to hide these types of prepations...which brings up the issue of Israeli preventive war or nuclear strike) will face the full fury of European/American nuclear power.
With the push of one little red button, Islam would vanish in the fog of history. That is precisely why the Soviets thought twice about the possibilities of an invasion.
This "slight" problem has already been covered in the first post. Please read it. As with alot of these same questions have been discussed before in this thread, I'm starting to get tired of answering the same questions over and over.
Anyways, in about 15 to 20 years an Islamic empire will have the bomb in decent quantities, they have it now (Pakistan). Even if we could destroy the whole Islamic world, they may still have a slim chance at nuking a handful of our major cities. A choice the West will not allow if they have a chance at beating them conventionaly.
So would you trade nuking the whole Muslim world for say, two of your cities, say Berlin and Hambur, when you still have a chance at beating them conventionaly? Maybe you would if you have the mentality of Saddam Hussien, or even Hilter.