Owww,... that must have been painful. You just shot yourself in the foot.
In the first case the Israeli does not "own" it,... Theft does not give legal ownership. If the Jew buys it, yes he does own it, but this would entail a legal agreement between the two. Your case is purely hypothetical and because as no such agreement has been reached regarding the West Bank, it has not been either sold nor donated to Israel, therefore it is still Palestinian land and they own it.
I realise that English is probably your second language and you obviously have difficulty in understanding the difference between, Ownership and Possession, but put simply. the word "own" implies rightful possession. (not theft)
You can see the difference in the meanings of the two words here. What you are talking about is possession, not ownership.
Sorry Seno, my mistake. I thought that owning ment having it , I dindn't know that it has something to do with legality. The dictionary I found first wasn't quite accurate (see below).
Code:
own
To have or possess
[URL="http://www.thefreedictionary.com/owning"]http://www.thefreedictionary.com/owning[/URL]
Allthough this has no influence on my point of view (see post 101 and 118)
My case is not hypothetical allthough very rare because of the death punishment.
In late April 2009, a Palestinian military court condemned a man to death by hanging for treason after he sold some land to Israelis. The death sentence requires the approval of the Palestinian Authority president, Mahmoud Abbas, who is not expected to approve it.
2010 : Qalqiliya – Ma'an – The Palestinian Authority Court of First Instance on Tuesday sentenced a Palestinian man to 10 years imprisonment on charges of selling land to Israel.
The accused, identified only by the initials AF, 44, from Qalqiliya in the occupied West Bank, was convicted in accordance with the 1960 article 144 of the penal code number 6.
AF's original sentence was reduced from 15 years to 10 years with manual labor.
Selling land to Israeli settlers is considered collaboration with an enemy state under the law and in Palestinian society, which deems such transactions detrimental to Palestinian national aspirations.