I am sure, there are attitudes, and as a ref I try to avoid them.
But, I am also sure, there is experience, and as a ref, I try to make use of it.
Both, of cause, influences - like it or not - decisions.
In my case (I have only fairly recently become ref, amateur class - but have been player and coach for many a years -, and my players are between 14 and 18, my main prob are
parents that want to "lynch" you for whatever decision you take or not) I *do* actively keep an eye on players that have a "record" (come it from audience, personal experience, or colleagues).
I understand players (esp in serious matches, which I never had - nor will have - to ref) can go adrenaline-to-upper-underlip-level, but I will *never* allow insults (from my POV this is not so much a player but rather a coach failure, he should explain to them how to act. I understand there are guys that are instruction-resistent, but, again: This is not my prob).
Should I have (which I haven´t had yet) a player with such record (insults) on my roster for the next one, I will investigate, *and* I will keep an eye on him, maybe more than on others.
Dont know whether this helps, I trust it was different in the 60/70´s, but the basics still sound true (and I apologize if that should come over offensively, not meant at all, just reporting to your request)
Rattler
P.S.: FDR, I am trying to let the game flow as ref w/o too much influencing (sure: making a stance in the first 5 min so they do not think I can be ignored or my beard pulled), it is the 2nd (when I was not dead sure about the first) foul I will not let pass without admonition (not necessecarily card, verbal also helps if the players are prepared to listen). Third goes yellow, fourth I will look for reasons to draw 2nd y/red.
My guess, I am one of the refs you would have got along with...
R.