BritinBritain
Per Ardua Ad Astra
Undoubtedly the square would have prolonged the action, but against such a vastly numerically superior foe wouldn't the outcome have eventually been the same? Shades of Fuzzy Wuzzy if you will. I wouldn't expect Lord Chelmsford or his collection of yes men to have responded any differently, & if they had managed to drag themselves back to the battle site I suspect it would have ccomplished little but to add their names to the roll of casualties.
I don't think the outcome would have been the same if a square had been used, the Zulu would not have been able to bring all their forces to bear at the same time. The usual Zulu method of attack was the Buffalo, the loins or chest attack full frontal, while the horns flanked left and right attacking the sides, joining at the rear and finally over running the position from the rear and sides. The Zulu would not have managed to achieve this as I mentioned the Zulu could not have brought all their forces to bear at the same time, they would be tripping over themselves and each other.
The Battle of Rorkes Drift bears this out as Lt Chard had effectively formed a square with his defences. A point to remember, the defenders at Rorkes Drift were out numbered 40 to 1 and carried the day, while the troops massacred at Isandlwana were outnumbered 25 to 1 and didn't.
I would actually like to see some sort of war game carried out by West Point or the British college at Sandhurst to see if it were possible to defeat the Zulu using the square. I think it would be extremely interesting.
Last edited: