Rndersafe, my ideas are my own, and they are very hard won, thank you very much. I will get rid of the ones that I choose to.
I guess i just mean if you become an officer, you'd better remember who guards you when you sleep. Remember who delivers your chow. Remember that without you things would keep working, but without soldiers, an officer is nothing. And if you have to put your ass on the line to see your boys get what they need, you better do it, or you ain't leading shit.
I stand by these words. I'm not saying a ROTC officer can't be a good officer, I just think they need to accept their limitations and accept the abilities of their men.
Perhaps you are right, in that there was a lack of discipline in my unit. Whose responsibility is that? MY section ran like a clock. PERIOD. We had each others back, we executed our missions, we did our duty.
Respect must be earned, by both sides of the equation.
This is EXACTLY my point.
Let's not take this wrong. I didn't hate officers. I did as I was told. And only under EXTREME circumstances would I do something like I described above. I am saying that an officer with prior service has BEEN where I was, had done what he was asking me to do, and knew full well what I could or could not do. He would respect the job I had to do because he had done it. A ROTC cadet HAS earned his commision, but has NOT YET SHARED HARDSHIPS WITH HIS MEN. Until he does, he's questionable. If anyone feels this is unreasonable, please feel free to reply.
Also, I will take back my statement that an Officer must be enlisted first to be a good officer. I can see how this is misleading, disrespectful, and it detracts from my actual point. My apologies.