gladius said:chewie_nz said:gladius said:Whispering Death said:Zyca said:My reaction to the article... it lost its creditability (for me at least) when its title worded "non-existent Chinese military threat ".
Lost credibility with me in the first 2 words "Self-serving US..."
Lol. That's how I see it too.
Who wrote this, someone related to Bagdad Bob?
Just ask yourself if China's military threat is non-existent why is it pushing hard to aquire European high-tech weaponery?...please. :roll:
Clearly propaganda with very little objectivity. People who keep reading articles like this and believing them, end up with tunnel vision.
it written by a writer in london....it's at the bottom, maybe you didn't get that far.
of course china is spending up large on Mil tech. their army is outdated, esp in light of the US steamrollering of iraq. just as the US sees china as a threat...i'm sure vise versa is true. so what are they supposed to do? sit on their hands.
p.s just because someone doesn't toe the us line, doesn't make them "bagdahd bob"
I read the whole thing, yes even the part about the writer from london.
The "Bagdad Bob" comment was because it was so ludcrously one sided to far left, that its to the point of well ... being ludicrous.
Just because they don't tow the US line doesn't mean they can't report objectively.
That piece of reporting was NOT objective.
If you want to report, report the facts, don't report it in such a way to influence the readers to your particular political point of view.
If keep believing stuff like that you will no longer see the facts enough to make sound judgements, and you only see what you want to see.
i couldn't agree with you more on the bias of this article....just a bit sick of seeing the rhetoric on this sight. sorry!
journalism is something close to my heart and i see so much bad reporting!