senojekips
Active member
I see you are still avoiding the point why this was raised even after at least two prior reminders. Anything to avoid admitting you are wrong , eh?
I note that you never said a single thing about the subject or to show how my statements are wrong? By now you must realise that nobody really reads your answers, because you are a proven liar who will say anything to try and gain a point, remember "the Palestinians who didn't resist the Israelis, then suddenly you are complaining about alleged Palestinian "atrocities" committed defending their land?
I only quoted the article to establish the date as the same as when he was shot and disprove your deliberate lie that "he was not a Protester" as it clearly states that he was arrested for "protesting", we know that the article is only Israeli Hasbara (without any photographic evidence), as I have posted a selection of clips from the video clearly showing the exit hole on the sole of the shoe with the spreading stain coming from it, hence my previously made point about how your lies and the lies of the Israeli Hasbara department (one and the same thing) never match up with the clearly visible physical evidence.
The stain emanating from that hole can be seen in a number of frames as it reflects the sun. I can't say categorically that it is blood, but what else would it be after having been shot through the foot, certainly not perspiration or a "broken blister". It's unfortunate for you, that the video actually shows a lot more than you realised before you started lying about what could and could not be seen.
Yes, of course I'm drinking a lot,...of water, the average daytime temperature here is 43 degrees C.What a messy answer. Again a lot of blablabla and your usual "evidence" like "Disproven several times" , you barely read my (and others) posts that you don't like, yet you claim what I (we) said is not true. You weren't drinking again were you?
I note that you never said a single thing about the subject or to show how my statements are wrong? By now you must realise that nobody really reads your answers, because you are a proven liar who will say anything to try and gain a point, remember "the Palestinians who didn't resist the Israelis, then suddenly you are complaining about alleged Palestinian "atrocities" committed defending their land?
OK you quote both posts and explain how my initial statement is wrong..... along with the photos and explanation as to how you miraculously diagnosed that the victim's foot was uninjured inside of his shoe. You are really getting yourself in a tangle here aren't you?... and it's only going to get worse for you so long as you keep lying. :lol:Of course it has nothing to do with your statement because your statement is flat out wrong.
OK,... please post this uncut video that you allege to have seen, but even if you are correct, this in no way proves that he did not die of his injuries. (As has been said previously at least 3 times).Ever seen a dead boy lift his arm and look to a camera? You never looked at the uncut video did you?
I have not only quoted facts, I have also posted frames from the video to support those facts, as yoet all you have done is quote Israeli Hasbara with no visible evidence.Same answer as in post About Rubber bullets, pros, cons, and
Seno, you are making a fool of yourself. You made a mistake but are to stubborn to admit it. That hole, which is not always seen on the video, can not come from a steel bullet that penetrated his foot. There's no blood to be seen. If he was shot like you said he was he would be crippled for the rest of his life. You see things that you want to see, not what is actually there.
I see you have been unable to produce visual evidence of this alleged "blistered toe", which after all the fuss about the original shooting would certainly have had photos taken of it. Previously given evidence by Israeli doctors regarding the injuries suffered from steel bullets make a complete mockery of the "blistered toe" story. Another reason demonstrating that this is no more than Israeli Hasbara.The article you quote from the Guardian can be read here: Israeli soldiers charged over shooting of Palestinian prisoner. I doubt if you read it, because this comes from the same article:Rahmeh, one of several dozen Palestinians who had been throwing stones at soldiers, suffered a bruised toe.I have another one, from your beloved Palestinians: Palestine: Information with Provenance (PIWP database)
The Palestinian man, Ashraf Abu Rahmeh, said yesterday he was injured in his left toe and treated at the scene. During an interview, Abu Rahmeh, 27, took off his shoe and showed a large blister on his toe, with bruising underneath. He said for several days after the shooting, the toe was swollen.
I only quoted the article to establish the date as the same as when he was shot and disprove your deliberate lie that "he was not a Protester" as it clearly states that he was arrested for "protesting", we know that the article is only Israeli Hasbara (without any photographic evidence), as I have posted a selection of clips from the video clearly showing the exit hole on the sole of the shoe with the spreading stain coming from it, hence my previously made point about how your lies and the lies of the Israeli Hasbara department (one and the same thing) never match up with the clearly visible physical evidence.
The stain emanating from that hole can be seen in a number of frames as it reflects the sun. I can't say categorically that it is blood, but what else would it be after having been shot through the foot, certainly not perspiration or a "broken blister". It's unfortunate for you, that the video actually shows a lot more than you realised before you started lying about what could and could not be seen.
Last edited: