FutureRANGER
Active member
Thanks for the insight.
And yes I was joking about the M1
And yes I was joking about the M1
Redneck said:On that note, I was talking to an MP Captain yesterday who told me that he had used an M16A4 with a collapsible stock, but I have only seen them with solid stocks, anybody know anything about that?
nulli secundus said:I dont like the fact that the Army is the one testing it out when it should really be Recon and Navy Seals, those are the guys who should really be testing it out. If it can surivive with Recon and Navy Seals it can survive with the rest.
RnderSafe said:Redneck said:On that note, I was talking to an MP Captain yesterday who told me that he had used an M16A4 with a collapsible stock, but I have only seen them with solid stocks, anybody know anything about that?
::cough::bullshit::cough::
nikoloslvy said:will the price m16's go up?
did the price of 45's go up when we changed to the 9 mm?
you cant buy semi automatic m16's?
Really? I think it looks fine... I guess that's a personal opinion, and not a really important point anyway. "Gee Sgt. , my gun works fine, but I wont take it in the field, it looks ugly on me and I'd rather die than look bad..." Not a very likely problem, is it?1328 said:I say H&K is a great gun company and that they have dropped low in the looks department on this case.
How do you figure that? There are lots of reliable handguns with "plastic" parts. (Glock. H&K USP / P8 etc.) So why would this rifle's reliability suffer from plastic components?1328 said:But the plastic creates a problem with reliability as well. HMMM.