Black hawks sucks!Anya1982 said:but i gotta say as a change of subject......................helo's
i still think sea king is a good helo obv. for its reasons of under water warfare capasity..............
but looking at us military i like the black hawk and the apache wouldn't go a miss lol
it sinks like a bloody brick!egoz said:How does the UH-60 suck? It has one of the best safety records for helos ever.
its cheap and easy to produceSikorsky would be proud.
mabye its reliable?I have no clue why the UH-1 is still in service. It's so loud and big and easy to shoot. But then again, you could ask why the B52 is still in service and I'd have the same response.
Well it is a helicopter, I don't remember it's ability to float being high on the priority list when putting a helo together. Does the UH-1 have a better ability to float?devilwasp said:it sinks like a bloody brick!
tanks float better!
i was talking about how it sucks as a navy chopper.egoz said:Well it is a helicopter, I don't remember it's ability to float being high on the priority list when putting a helo together. Does the UH-1 have a better ability to float?
The UH-1 was hastily put together because of the war. It's a great helo and all, but it's design had flaws. First off, it was extremely whide and made an easy target. The Blackhawk is the replacement for it and I think it was an extremely well developed aircraft. It's a lot faster, quieter, more reliable, and a h**l of a lot safer. Not to mention it has a smaller radar return signature, cross sectional area, better lift capability, range, passenger space, the list goes on. I don't see how it's ability to float could over ride all of the improvements over the Huey.
they've been phasing it out recently. i believe there are less than 100 active duty hueys left in the army. there are something like 50 in the ANG. within the next couple of years they will all be gone.devilwasp said:the Huey i dunno why its still there like, i dont see it as better its over 30 years aint it?