MontyB
All-Blacks Supporter
Anyone have any insight into this?
My opinion is that it makes some rather dubious claims not the least of which is that it does not take into account replacements and training capability, my "guess" is that IF a major war was to break out then some form of draft or conscription would be implemented thus bringing in a sizable number of replacements.
The next thing is who are they going to fight, in Europe any further expansion by Russia would be into a NATO country which means the British Army is going to be fighting alongside NATO nations and in Asia/Pacific the USA, Australia, Korea, etc. so it is extremely unlikely Britain will be going it alone.
While I can accept the argument that in its current form it is not capable of sustaining major operations beyond six months but that is true of almost every modern western military but the resources flow a lot freer in wartime.
My opinion is that it makes some rather dubious claims not the least of which is that it does not take into account replacements and training capability, my "guess" is that IF a major war was to break out then some form of draft or conscription would be implemented thus bringing in a sizable number of replacements.
The next thing is who are they going to fight, in Europe any further expansion by Russia would be into a NATO country which means the British Army is going to be fighting alongside NATO nations and in Asia/Pacific the USA, Australia, Korea, etc. so it is extremely unlikely Britain will be going it alone.
While I can accept the argument that in its current form it is not capable of sustaining major operations beyond six months but that is true of almost every modern western military but the resources flow a lot freer in wartime.