Darcia said:
Kim has nothing on Hitler. Hitler is possible one of the best and worst rulers the world has ever seen. He managed to get the people behind him and to follow him. he was able to motivate his people to go to war by using techniques politicians still to today. Not to meation he made everyone believe he wasn't going to go to war then took Poland and France in a matter of weeks. Kim on the other hand got the power from his daddy. Has no control over his people (they try to flee into SK and CHINA NK is so bad they want to go to China). O yeah Hitler had an army that could crush any European force he came against. Kim's army looks more like a Soviet Museum.
I'd beg to differ. Hitler was the worst ruler. The man was a Corporal from the First World War. He had the country by the ears, it was in ruins, anyone could have stepped up and taken control. Not only that but he didn't have American troops across a DMZ and the mainland America with enough nukes to make his arsenal look like Disneyland special effects. And considering that Germany is quite large and had one of the most advanced scientific communities.
But don't under estimate his capabilities. A Soviet T-54/55 can still knockout an M1A2 or Challenger 2 by hitting the engine. Not only that but it only takes one nuke to blowup a city. And your comparing 1930-40's tactic and equipment with modern day stuff.
he was able to motivate his people to go to war by using techniques politicians still to today.
Its quite easy to convince a country that just had the H**l beat out of it to go to war. Besides vary rarely do political techniques change.
But in the end they are all the same, nuts, quacks, hungery for world power.